Update Magazine III/2018 |
Mr. Pross, you occupy a leading position in a global fund management company, you represent the entire German fund sector as president of the BVI, and in a book contribution1 you recently argued in favour of promoting employee share ownership. Do these things go together?
Tobias Pross:
Absolutely. The opportunities for
employee capital participation are many and
varied, and were summed up very aptly by the
Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs
under its then Minister, Olaf Scholz: “Employees
are better able to identify with ‘their’ company;
this enhances solidarity, transparency and
motivation, thereby strengthening the company’s
financial basis.”2
But for me, while there are advantages for
“governance”, I am far more interested in the
benefits to society: the dividing line between
capital and labour is done away with.
Employees become owners who share in
the company’s success not only through their
salaries, but also indirectly through capital. They
become partners in the company’s success,
expecting to share in the risk premium on the
capital invested in the business. Especially at
a time when the share of wages in aggregate
national income is falling in favour of capital
income – a trend that’s apparent in all
industrialised countries – participation in capital
income should be promoted through share
ownership. Ultimately, it is also a way of
combating the much debated problem of
“inequality” of both wealth and income.
But what is an active manager’s role in this? And, what’s more, one who has to think about risk diversification?
Tobias Pross:
In two ways, I believe: through
integration into the ESG screening process, and
through the promotion of “shareholder funds”
(Teilhaberfonds). Employee share ownership –
defined as direct participation by employees in
the capital of the companies which employ them
– can only ever be a first step towards capital
investment. But here too we have a part to play
as an asset management company, especially
one which pursues ESG as an integrative
approach in its strategies. “ESG” stands for
environmental, social and governance. Half of
the globally managed funds of institutional
investors are managed in accordance with
the United Nations Principles for Responsible
Investment (PRI), from which ESG is derived.
These are worth around 60 trillion US dollars.
So my suggestion is that the benefits of
employee share ownership should be integrated
into the enterprise value analysis as standard
procedure via ESG criteria. These would cover
not only “governance” (the incentive structure),
but above all the “social” criterion, with its subcategories
“relationship with the community”,
“fair working conditions” and “remuneration
and benefits”. Consequently, companies that
intensively promote employee participation in
the business would have an advantage in the
competition for capital.
But the cluster risk remains, of course…
Tobias Pross:
Indeed. Employee share ownership
as part of good corporate governance must be
viewed critically in the context of the cluster risk of
the shareholder-employee. In the worst case
scenario, if the company goes bankrupt for
example, an employee with a stake in the
company he works for could lose both his job
and his accumulated wealth.
What solution do you propose?
Tobias Pross:
Arguing for the promotion of
employee share ownership is one thing. Providing
suitable instruments to balance risk and return is
the other way in which the fund industry can
contribute to this socio-politically important task.
In my opinion, the solution lies in “shareholder
funds” (Teilhaberfonds).
Shareholder funds are not an entirely new idea in
terms of the basic principle. In 2009, the “employee
participation fund” (Mitarbeiterbeteiligungsfonds)
was included in the German Investment Act,
creating a new fund category.
Fungible and non-fungible equity investments
by employees of different companies can be
introduced into funds of this type in order to
spread the risk. This allows indirect participation
using the fund as a vehicle. The fund’s assets have
the status of separate assets (Sondervermögen),
that is to say, it is administered by a fund
company, but the units contained in the fund
remain the property of the unitholders.
But these employee participation funds have never really taken off.
Tobias Pross:
That is undeniable. Employee
participation funds answer the need for risk
diversification, but may be considered too
inflexible, since the investment universe is limited
to the participating companies. It is also
questionable how employees can exercise their ownership rights when they contribute equity
capital, and thus have a say in company
decisions. Genuine participation also includes
being able to exercise one’s ownership rights
to capital.
But this isn’t possible with regular funds.
Tobias Pross:
No, but in the age of digitalisation
we must find a way of moving from “proxy voting”
to “shareholder voting”. The fund’s unitholders
would be given the right to vote at companies’
general meetings in proportion to the number of
units they hold. They could exchange these with
each other in order to exercise voting rights in the
company for which they work and whose shares
they have contributed, and do so wherever they
want. All this could be achieved with an app.
Diversification and the exercise of voting rights,
i.e. ownership rights, need not be mutually
exclusive. Let me cut to the chase: at a time of
great technological disruption, which will not
be without its effects on income and wealth
distribution3, we fund managers have to rise to
the challenge of enabling “prosperity for all”.
Active management means allowing people
across the board to share in the wealth
generated by the economy as a whole.
1) The book “CSR und Mitarbeiterbeteiligung: Die Kapitalbeteiligung für das 21. Jahrhundert.” (CSR and
employee participation: equity investment in the 21st century” will be published this October by Springer. The editors
are Dr. Heinrich Beyer and Hans-Jörg Naumer, who conducted the interview.
2) Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs; “Employee Capital Participation – Models and Support Paths”;
2009
3) See also the interview with Carl-Benedikt Frey in “Update II/2017”
Investing involves risk. The statements contained herein may include statements of future
expectations and other forward-looking statements that are based on management‘s current
views and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could
cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied
in such statements. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statement. The
value of an investment and the income from it may fall as well as rise and investors may not get
back the full amount invested. There is no guarantee that the strategy will succeed and losses
cannot be ruled out. Investors may not get back the full amount invested.
The volatility of fund unit prices may be increased or even strongly increased. Past
performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. If the currency in which the past
performance is displayed differs from the currency of the country in which the investor resides,
then the investor should be aware that due to the exchange rate fluctuations the performance
shown may be higher or lower if converted into the investor’s local currency.
This is for information only and not to be construed as a solicitation or an invitation to make an
offer, to conclude a contract, or to buy or sell any securities. The products or securities described
herein may not be available for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors.
This is for distribution only as permitted by applicable law and in particular not available to
residents and/or nationals of the USA. The investment opportunities described herein do not
take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation, knowledge, experience
or particular needs of any particular person and are not guaranteed. The views and opinions
expressed herein, which are subject to change without notice, are those of the issuer and/or its
affiliated companies at the time of publication. The data used is derived from various sources,
and assumed to be correct and reliable, but it has not been independently verified; its accuracy
or completeness is not guaranteed and no liability is assumed for any direct or consequential
losses arising from its use, unless caused by gross negligence or willful misconduct. The
conditions of any underlying offer or contract that may have been, or will be, made or
concluded, shall prevail.
Contact the issuer electronically or via mail at the address indicated below for a free copy of
the sales prospectus, the incorporation documents, the latest annual and semi-annual financial
reports and the key investor information document in English. Please read these documents –
which are solely binding – carefully before investing.
For investors in Europe (excluding Switzerland): This is a marketing communication issued
by Allianz Global Investors GmbH, www.allianzgi.com, an investment company with limited
liability, incorporated in Germany, with its registered office at Bockenheimer Landstrasse 42–44,
60323 Frankfurt/M, registered with the local court Frankfurt/M under HRB 9340, authorised by
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (www.bafin.de). Allianz Global Investors GmbH
has established branches in the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Spain, Luxembourg and the
Netherlands. Contact details and information on the local regulation are available here
(www.allianzgi.com/Info).
For investors in Switzerland: This is a marketing communication issued by Allianz Global Investors
(Schweiz) AG, a 100% subsidiary of Allianz Global Investors GmbH, licensed by FINMA
(www.finma.ch) for distribution and by OAKBV (Oberaufsichtskommission berufliche Vorsorge)
for asset management related to occupational pensions.. Details about the extent of the local
regulation are available from us on request.
This report does not satisfy all legal requirements on the guarantee of impartiality in investment
recommendations and investment strategy recommendations and is not subject to any trade
restrictions prior to the publication of such recommendations. The duplication, publication, or
transmission of the contents, irrespective of the form, is not permitted.
Summary
As our investment experts gathered in Asia’s financial centre, our proximity to mainland China seemed particularly fitting given the US-China trade war that has been roiling the markets. Amid rising global leverage, political uncertainty and a patchy global economy, taking an active, long-term view may be investors’ best approach.